Donna - According to their wiki page, Vancity Credit Union is, since 2010, a member of the Global Alliance for Banking on Values. You have to wonder if this alliance isn't somehow connected to Meghan's problems with Vancity? I would be curious if she's been able to set up an account with another institution while this drama plays out. https://www.gabv.org/
You’re right. I know the election is dominating everything right now, but Meghan is a PPC candidate. I would’ve expected to hear more from her party about this. Very strange.
In April of 2022 in the Restitution section of Freedom Should be Guaranteed and Protected I included the following 2 paragraphs:
"If a bank account is frozen without a court order for that specific organization or individual, then unless a court order is subsequently obtained, funds frozen will be unfrozen and the party responsible for the freezing shall make further restitution in an amount equal to the amount frozen. If the amount frozen is less than $10,000 then the restitution shall be $10,000. While it might be necessary in certain cases to obtain a court order without representation from all parties, a proper hearing including all parties must be started within seven days.
Anyone or organization including but not limited to Governments, private companies, non-profits or individuals and those representing those organizations or individuals including those in elected positions who are responsible for infringing on the rights of any Canadian, is subject to criminal charges. Essentially what I am saying is it does not matter if you are the Prime Minister, a Minister, a Premier, a Mayor, a board member, an employee or an individual acting on your own, it should be considered an illegal criminal act to infringe on anyone's rights under the Charter and accordingly such acts should be subject to criminal prosecution. This would include those who enact legislation that infringes on those rights."
Generally I do not like to include links to my own work on Donna's Substack, however, in this case I am making an exception as I think readers should know where it came from.
Meghan was interviewed by The Rebel yesterday April 25, 2025. In it she said that the government communicated with the Credit Union by fax. So below is my comment and a link to the interview:
"Okay I will ask the obvious question that admittedly only came to my mind this morning when we were talking about it. Meghan said that the government communicated this order with the Credit Union by FAX. It would be very easy for someone who knows how to create a fake document and spoof the caller ID. It also seems odd that the government would communicate this by fax. Has the Credit Union confirmed that this order is really legitimate? Also, by who, which government, what department & signed by who?"
Donna - According to their wiki page, Vancity Credit Union is, since 2010, a member of the Global Alliance for Banking on Values. You have to wonder if this alliance isn't somehow connected to Meghan's problems with Vancity? I would be curious if she's been able to set up an account with another institution while this drama plays out. https://www.gabv.org/
Thanks, Ron. Interesting. I don't think she has tried to open a new Canadian bank account over the past few days.
BTW, where is Max (or the PPC) on this. It does not seem to be getting the coverage it should.
You’re right. I know the election is dominating everything right now, but Meghan is a PPC candidate. I would’ve expected to hear more from her party about this. Very strange.
In April of 2022 in the Restitution section of Freedom Should be Guaranteed and Protected I included the following 2 paragraphs:
"If a bank account is frozen without a court order for that specific organization or individual, then unless a court order is subsequently obtained, funds frozen will be unfrozen and the party responsible for the freezing shall make further restitution in an amount equal to the amount frozen. If the amount frozen is less than $10,000 then the restitution shall be $10,000. While it might be necessary in certain cases to obtain a court order without representation from all parties, a proper hearing including all parties must be started within seven days.
Anyone or organization including but not limited to Governments, private companies, non-profits or individuals and those representing those organizations or individuals including those in elected positions who are responsible for infringing on the rights of any Canadian, is subject to criminal charges. Essentially what I am saying is it does not matter if you are the Prime Minister, a Minister, a Premier, a Mayor, a board member, an employee or an individual acting on your own, it should be considered an illegal criminal act to infringe on anyone's rights under the Charter and accordingly such acts should be subject to criminal prosecution. This would include those who enact legislation that infringes on those rights."
Generally I do not like to include links to my own work on Donna's Substack, however, in this case I am making an exception as I think readers should know where it came from.
http://heinzegroup.com/insight.htm#29
Meghan was interviewed by The Rebel yesterday April 25, 2025. In it she said that the government communicated with the Credit Union by fax. So below is my comment and a link to the interview:
"Okay I will ask the obvious question that admittedly only came to my mind this morning when we were talking about it. Meghan said that the government communicated this order with the Credit Union by FAX. It would be very easy for someone who knows how to create a fake document and spoof the caller ID. It also seems odd that the government would communicate this by fax. Has the Credit Union confirmed that this order is really legitimate? Also, by who, which government, what department & signed by who?"
https://www.rebelnews.com/ppc_candidate_and_womens_activist_details_how_her_bank_account_was_frozen