First They Came for the Truckers
Meghan Murphy interviewed me about frozen bank accounts the day before her own was seized.
Hours before Meghan Murphy discovered her Canadian bank account had been frozen, we prerecorded an interview about my book, Thank You, Truckers! During our chat, she asked about the individuals within its pages who’d had their bank accounts frozen. These include Jamaican immigrant O’Jay, whose two teenaged sons also lost access to their funds - because dad’s name was associated with their accounts and he’d just spent the past three weeks in his blue Peterbilt peacefully protesting on Wellington Street.
The full audio of our hour-long discussion is now available (click below):
As of yesterday, Meghan remains unable to access her own, hard-earned cash. She has received no explanation, and no indication of when this matter will be resolved.
It’s important to remember: she has not been charged with any crime - never mind convicted of one. To her knowledge, no court order was sought or secured.
To quote retired trucker Peter Terranova from Chapter 32, who experienced the same fate: “It's my money, and I have rights."
Meghan was interviewed by The Rebel yesterday April 25, 2025. In it she said that the government communicated with the Credit Union by fax. So below is my comment and a link to the interview:
"Okay I will ask the obvious question that admittedly only came to my mind this morning when we were talking about it. Meghan said that the government communicated this order with the Credit Union by FAX. It would be very easy for someone who knows how to create a fake document and spoof the caller ID. It also seems odd that the government would communicate this by fax. Has the Credit Union confirmed that this order is really legitimate? Also, by who, which government, what department & signed by who?"
https://www.rebelnews.com/ppc_candidate_and_womens_activist_details_how_her_bank_account_was_frozen
In April of 2022 in the Restitution section of Freedom Should be Guaranteed and Protected I included the following 2 paragraphs:
"If a bank account is frozen without a court order for that specific organization or individual, then unless a court order is subsequently obtained, funds frozen will be unfrozen and the party responsible for the freezing shall make further restitution in an amount equal to the amount frozen. If the amount frozen is less than $10,000 then the restitution shall be $10,000. While it might be necessary in certain cases to obtain a court order without representation from all parties, a proper hearing including all parties must be started within seven days.
Anyone or organization including but not limited to Governments, private companies, non-profits or individuals and those representing those organizations or individuals including those in elected positions who are responsible for infringing on the rights of any Canadian, is subject to criminal charges. Essentially what I am saying is it does not matter if you are the Prime Minister, a Minister, a Premier, a Mayor, a board member, an employee or an individual acting on your own, it should be considered an illegal criminal act to infringe on anyone's rights under the Charter and accordingly such acts should be subject to criminal prosecution. This would include those who enact legislation that infringes on those rights."
Generally I do not like to include links to my own work on Donna's Substack, however, in this case I am making an exception as I think readers should know where it came from.
http://heinzegroup.com/insight.htm#29