Just finished reading the 12 Days - Being retired and having spent 22 days parked on Wellington- I was very interested in the Inquiry And watched pretty well all of it! That being said - didn’t read anything in this e-book or anywhere lease during and sense the completion of the Inquiry any concerns about the fact that when Trudeau testified under oath openly perjured himself by stating he didn’t call anyone names - the Commissioner didn’t even remind him that the whole world was watching and that perjury is a criminal offence! he was very quick to warn and threaten the spectators in the hearing for their gasping and laughing at the P.M. statement - wasn’t or isn’t the commissioner supposed to be impartial?
Good point, Peter. That CCF document criticizes Brendan Miller, the lawyer who represented the convoy (and who no doubt spent much of those weeks in Ottawa overwhelmed by the regular addition of hundreds to thousands of new pages of evidence).
Yet it steered entirely clear of the perjury concerns shared by millions of Canadians.
There may, of course, be a good reason for these choices. In any event, definitely worth noticing.
To me Donna it indicates what kind of biased findings we will be presented with when the report will be released with a month’s time - very sad and disappointing- Canadians deserve more!
Just finished reading the 12 Days - Being retired and having spent 22 days parked on Wellington- I was very interested in the Inquiry And watched pretty well all of it! That being said - didn’t read anything in this e-book or anywhere lease during and sense the completion of the Inquiry any concerns about the fact that when Trudeau testified under oath openly perjured himself by stating he didn’t call anyone names - the Commissioner didn’t even remind him that the whole world was watching and that perjury is a criminal offence! he was very quick to warn and threaten the spectators in the hearing for their gasping and laughing at the P.M. statement - wasn’t or isn’t the commissioner supposed to be impartial?
Good point, Peter. That CCF document criticizes Brendan Miller, the lawyer who represented the convoy (and who no doubt spent much of those weeks in Ottawa overwhelmed by the regular addition of hundreds to thousands of new pages of evidence).
Yet it steered entirely clear of the perjury concerns shared by millions of Canadians.
There may, of course, be a good reason for these choices. In any event, definitely worth noticing.
To me Donna it indicates what kind of biased findings we will be presented with when the report will be released with a month’s time - very sad and disappointing- Canadians deserve more!