Thanks, Donna. Have only scanned the document - boy, what a lot of legalize! We seem to have been in so much danger! And our worldwide reputation was at stake! This is going to require a whole lot of convincing.
Thank you Donna for taking the time to read these documents and give us a well rounded picture. What we see depends on our point of view. That applies to physical sight as well as psychological and spiritual sight. As you delve into them watch for actual evidence of illegal activity that could trigger the act. Basing public action on the anticipated reactions of foreign entities is about as remote from rule of law as you can get. Lots of lawyers make for lots of words trying to explain nuances and extrapolate related legal principles but the final answer to “Did the protestors endanger Canada and require the act to protect the country?” has to be reducible to Yes or No. No matter how many push a lie it can't be drives across the line into the territory of truth.
Thanks, Donna. Have only scanned the document - boy, what a lot of legalize! We seem to have been in so much danger! And our worldwide reputation was at stake! This is going to require a whole lot of convincing.
So appreciate you doing all this work Donna to wade through this difficult material. This is incredibly important work for the benefit of all.
Thank you Donna for taking the time to read these documents and give us a well rounded picture. What we see depends on our point of view. That applies to physical sight as well as psychological and spiritual sight. As you delve into them watch for actual evidence of illegal activity that could trigger the act. Basing public action on the anticipated reactions of foreign entities is about as remote from rule of law as you can get. Lots of lawyers make for lots of words trying to explain nuances and extrapolate related legal principles but the final answer to “Did the protestors endanger Canada and require the act to protect the country?” has to be reducible to Yes or No. No matter how many push a lie it can't be drives across the line into the territory of truth.
It is of course worth considering, none of the 23 could afford to be truthful, giving an unfair advantage to the 4.