It Has To Be a Real Emergency
Perrin Beatty, sponsor of the Emergencies Act, never expected it to be used against nuisances.
Perrin Beatty, the former cabinet minister who shepherded the Emergencies Act through Canada’s Parliament in 1988 has given an interview to La Presse, a French-language, Montreal-based newspaper. (Read an auto translation of it here.)
Beatty, who’s currently president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, is clearly appalled that the government used this legislation against the truckers last year. It was intended, he says, for highly exceptional circumstances - for example a devastating earthquake in British Columbia:
We were very clear that there had to be a real emergency and the definition of that emergency was deliberately drafted to include a very high threshold.
Beatty says he never expected the Emergencies Act to be deployed as a means of dealing with nuisances, or at a point in time in which matters were already de-escalating. "It was designed to provide the government with a scalpel rather than a sledgehammer,” he says. He, too, is urging the government to release the secret legal opinion on which it relied to make its decision.
After all “Trust us” is hardly a persuasive argument. In recent days Mario Dion, the federal ethics commissioner, has urged the government to make ethics training mandatory for cabinet members due to ongoing ethical lapses at the highest levels. Pointing out that these lapses undermine public confidence, Dion didn’t hide his exasperation:
No one’s resigning, no one’s forced to resign and no one is shuffled. And there’s no appearance of even any sort of accountability, beyond…a quick mea culpa. [bold added]
Canada’s current federal government is broken. The Ethics Commissioner knows this. The man who sponsored the Emergencies Act back in 1988 knows this.
Later today, we’ll learn whether Justice Paul Rouleau, the Commissioner of the Emergencies Act inquiry, also knows it.
Rouleau’s findings will reportedly be tabled in the House of Commons at noon today.
I highly doubt there was any real legal opinion other than you know who just declared it.
We are having a similar case going on here in South Africa. It has gone so far that the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs has refused to obey a high court order to provide the information on decision-making processes regarding Covid disaster management regulations. Its has been going on for two years.
Dr Nkosazana-Dlamini Zuma, Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, remains in contempt of a court order instructing her to submit to Sakeliga several records concerning her 2020 state of disaster decisions. As a result, Sakeliga Afrikaans, translates as (Business League) has now started a process to have the minister declared guilty of contempt of court.